Exposure Management
Validate your exposure from both sides of the perimeter — what the internet sees, and what an insider could reach.
The Open Security Experience
Discover → Validate → See & act → Improve. This engagement lights the stages that match how Open Security delivers it — and stays connected to the rest of the experience.
The problem
External-only assessments miss lateral movement paths; internal-only views miss what the internet already knows about you. Attackers use both — your assessment should too.
Two vendors, two reports, and no single ranked plan for what to fix first.
Perimeter findings never get walked internally, so the real path stays theoretical.
The next assessment cannot measure progress because last time’s inventory did not survive.
How the engagement is run
Operators run the engagement. You stay in the decisions that shape scope, evidence, and what gets closed.
Confirm external and internal scope, assets, and what a useful result looks like.
See the perimeter the way an unauthenticated attacker sees it — cloud edge, email, public assets.
Follow Active Directory and lateral paths a credential would actually use.
One prioritized plan ranked by attack-path impact — not two disconnected PDFs.
Remediation sequenced so the next cycle measures progress instead of starting over.
The relationship
A dual-scope assessment is the baseline. Keeping that inventory, ranking, and 30/60/90 plan alive is how the next cycle measures progress instead of producing another disconnected PDF.
Internal and external findings share one inventory and one prioritization model.
The 30/60/90 plan is written so the next assessment can re-measure the same work.
Many teams move from this baseline into a living vulnerability management program.
The Open Security difference
External perimeter and cloud edge assessed the way an unauthenticated attacker sees it.
Internal Active Directory and lateral movement paths walked by hand, not just scanned.
One combined report ranked by real attack-path impact, not two disconnected PDFs.
Outcomes
A dual-scope assessment report with exploitability context
A prioritized 30/60/90-day remediation plan
Wireless and guest network exposure validated
A baseline you can re-measure against every cycle
What complements this engagement — and what teams typically run next.
Operators do the work. Technology keeps it connected.
Sirius
Assessment results live in Sirius, so internal and external findings share one inventory, one prioritization model, and one trend line — and your next assessment measures progress instead of starting over.
Explore Sirius →Attackers use both. External-only work misses lateral movement; internal-only work misses what the internet already knows. One plan beats two reports.
An assessment maps exposure from both sides and ranks what to fix. A penetration test goes further to prove which paths actually exploit. Many clients do the assessment first.
Most run two to three weeks from kickoff to the combined report, depending on environment size and access.
Yes, for the internal walk — typically a test account or agreed network access. External work does not require that.
Results can live in Sirius so the next assessment measures the same inventory. Many teams move from a point-in-time assessment into the vulnerability management program.
The Open Security Experience
You do not need to buy the entire platform. These stages show how this service becomes more powerful as part of the Open Security Experience.
Talk with an operator about what the internet already knows — and what a credential could reach from inside.
