Security Validation

Penetration Testing Services

Operator-led adversarial testing that proves which attack paths actually work against your business — and what closing them is worth.

Scope an engagementSee the engagement
A precise illuminated path through layered structure, representing controlled validation of an attack path

The Open Security Experience

Where this service sits.

Discover → Validate → See & act → Improve. This engagement lights the stages that match how Open Security delivers it — and stays connected to the rest of the experience.

  1. 01DiscoverSee where risk lives.
  2. 02ValidateProve what actually works.
  3. 03See & actPrioritize and close it.
  4. 04ImproveGet stronger next cycle.

The problem

Most penetration tests end at the PDF.

A yearly test that produces a hundred-page report does not tell you what to fix, fund, or prioritize. Findings without exploitability context are noise — and noise is why critical paths stay open.

  • Reports rank by severity, not by whether a determined adversary would actually take the path.

  • Remediation teams cannot tell which findings change the business if they close them.

  • The next test starts from zero because last year’s context never stayed with the team.

The path

  1. 01Internet edge
  2. 02Stolen credential
  3. 03Lateral movement
  4. 04Crown-jewel impact

The question is not how many findings you have. It is which route actually works.

How the engagement is run

The work, from context to follow-through.

Operators run the engagement. You stay in the decisions that shape scope, evidence, and what gets closed.

What's in scope

  • External and internal network penetration testing
  • Web, mobile, and API application testing
  • Cloud configuration and identity path review
  • Social engineering and phishing (optional add-on)
  • Executive readout and technical appendix

The relationship

A program, not a point-in-time PDF.

A test that disappears into a binder is a snapshot. An operator relationship keeps the environment, the evidence, and the closures connected — so the next engagement measures improvement instead of repeating the same story.

  1. 01

    The same operators retain context between tests — your environment, your risk threshold, and what you already closed.

  2. 02

    Validated findings stay connected to remediation and retest, not stranded in a yearly PDF.

  3. 03

    Each cycle has a baseline. You can see whether the paths that mattered last time are actually gone.

The Open Security difference

Testing with intent, not a template.

  1. 01

    Every engagement is led by senior operators doing hands-on testing — not junior analysts re-running scan output.

  2. 02

    We scope around your business risk threshold first, and we tell you what not to test to save effort and budget.

  3. 03

    We stay through remediation and retest, so findings become validated closures instead of open questions.

Outcomes

What is different when you leave.

  1. 01

    A risk-ranked register of exploitable findings — not scanner noise

  2. 02

    An attack narrative your engineers can replay and your board can follow

  3. 03

    Remediation guidance sequenced by business impact

  4. 04

    Validated closure: we retest, you prove the risk is gone

Related capabilities

What complements this engagement — and what teams typically run next.

Related technology

Operators do the work. Technology keeps it connected.

Aludra

How Aludra makes the test more thorough

Operators run Aludra — a continuous penetration-testing environment built on our methodology — so the engagement covers more ground and delivers proven-exploitable findings. It is our IP, used to make the work more thorough — never a tool we sell or hand off.

Explore Aludra →
Aludra pipeline with a completed validation run and proven findings

Portal

How Portal keeps the evidence in view

Validated findings and retest status surface in Portal — the client view — so leadership sees what is exploitable, what is closed, and what the next engagement should prove.

Explore Portal →
Portal analytics showing engagement findings and exposure trend

Common questions

How is this different from a vulnerability scan?

A scan lists possibilities. This engagement proves which attack paths actually work, with exploit evidence and business impact — then stays through remediation and retest.

Will testing disrupt production?

We coordinate windows and safe-test rules with your operations team before any testing starts. High-impact techniques are gated; you approve the blast radius.

How long does an engagement take?

Most network and application tests run two to four weeks from kickoff to readout, depending on scope and environment complexity. We confirm the window in scoping.

What do we need to provide?

A point of contact, agreed scope, and access or test accounts where authenticated testing is in play. We handle the rest and keep you in the decisions that matter.

Do you retest after we remediate?

Yes. Critical and high findings include retest criteria. We confirm the path is closed instead of leaving a finding open in a PDF.

How is Aludra used in the test?

Operators run Aludra as a continuous testing environment to cover more ground and produce proven-exploitable findings. It is our IP — used to make the work more thorough, never a tool we sell or hand off.

The Open Security Experience

What comes before and after.

You do not need to buy the entire platform. These stages show how this service becomes more powerful as part of the Open Security Experience.

  1. 01DiscoverSirius + Sirius ProFind the exposure.
  2. 02ValidateAludraProve what is exploitable.
  3. 03See & actOpen Security PortalPrioritize and remediate.
  4. 04ImproveRTable + TrainingStrengthen readiness.

Ready to prove which paths actually work?

Talk through scope with an operator — the assets that matter, the paths worth testing, and what closing them is worth.

Talk to an operator